sl/plan9 OK, uriel.


date: 2020-06-19 layout: post title: Email service provider recommendations

tags: [email]

Email is important to my daily workflow, and I’ve built many tools which encourage productive use of it for software development. As such, I’m often asked for advice on choosing a good email service provider. Personally, I run my own mail servers, but about a year ago I signed up for and evaluated many different service providers available today so that I could make informed recommendations to people. Here are my top picks, as well as the criteria by which they were evaluated.

Unfortunately, almost all mail providers fail to meet my criteria. As such, I can only recommend two: Migadu and mailbox.org.

#1: Migadu

Migadu is my go-to recommendation for a mail service provider.

Advantages

Disadvantages

Full disclosure: SourceHut and Migadu agreed to a consulting arrangement to build their new webmail system, which should be going into production soon. However, I had evaluated and started recommending Migadu prior to the start of this project, and I believe that Migadu fares well under the criteria I give at the end of this post.

#2: mailbox.org

Mailbox.org may be desirable if you wish to have a more curated experience, and less hands-on access to postmaster-specific features.

Advantages

Disadvantages

Others

Evaluated but not recommended: disroot, fastmail, posteo.de, poste.io, protonmail, tutanota, riseup, cock.li, teknik, runbox, megacorp mail (gmail, outlook, etc).

Criteria for a good mail service provider

The following criteria are objective and non-negotiable:

  1. Support for open standards including IMAP and SMTP
  2. Support for users who wish to bring their own domain

This is necessary to preserve the user’s ownership of their data by making it accessible over open and standardized protocols, and their right to move to another service provider by not fixing their identity to a domain name controlled by the email provider. It is for these reasons that Posteo, ProtonMail, and Tutanota are not considered suitable.

The remaining criteria are subjective:

  1. Is the business conducted ethically? Are their incentives aligned with their customers, or with their investors?
  2. Is it sustainable? Can I expect them to be around in 10 years? 20? 30?
  3. Do they make unfounded claims about security or privacy, or develop techniques which ultimately rely on trusting them instead of supporting or improving standards which rely on encryption?^1
  4. If they make claims about privacy or security, do they explain the limitations and trade-offs, or do they let you believe it’s infallible?
  5. Do you trust them with your personal data? What if they’re compelled by law enforcement? What is their government like?^2

Bonus points:

If you represent a mail service provider which you believe meets this criteria, please send me an email.